Feed not covered under US and Australian food system recognition deal

© iStock/choreograph

The FDA says Australia's food system is comparable to the US, but the recognition may not initially bring much change for the feed industry in either country.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Australian Department of Agriculture and Water Resources announced last week they recognised the commonalities of both food safety systems.

The move means that they can “leverage” the science-based regulatory systems in both countries to help ensure food safety.

The US has also recognized New Zealand and Canada as having comparable food safety systems — New Zealand in 2012 and Canada in 2016. The US and Mexican officials are said to be working on a similar agreement.

The agreement with Australia is not set to include feed or ingredients intended for feed at this time, but that remains a possibility, an FDA spokesperson told FeedNavigator.

“Animal feed is not covered under the current systems recognition arrangements,” the spokesperson said. “FDA may consider options for covering it in the future.”

It is unclear, at this point, why feed products were not included in the agreement. However, initial work to establish the program did consider practices for imported and feed of multiple governments, said the FDA.

The arrangement with New Zealand did account for the inclusion of animal feed, said the FDA, while that with Canada did not.

Regulatory cooperation

The comparability process involves a prioritization in inspection activities for some products coming from the respective country, said the US agency. It sets a framework for regulatory cooperation for several areas including scientific collaboration and outbreak response.  

The FDA reviewed Australia’s domestic food safety regulation to establish if the system offers a similar system of protection to what is provided by the FDA. Those practices set the baseline of public health protection and assurance of safety for exported foods, it said.

“Australia meets the criteria for systems recognition as it has, over time, demonstrated that it takes a proactive, preventive approach to food safety management and works to minimize adverse events when they occur,” said the FDA. “Once systems recognition is implemented through a mutual agreement, both the US FDA and the government of Australia will be able to more appropriately target inspectional resources to higher risk country-commodity combinations and leverage resources to address common food safety concerns.”

Related News

© istock/Rawpixel

Navis Capital acquires large NZ egg and feed producer

© istock/subtropica

EU organic farming regulation still proving divisive

Regulator publishes plan to simplify UK's food laws

Attitudes to EU emissions regulations revealed

Regulator concerned about safety of BioProtein

© iStock.com/SafakOguz

Feed industry views sought in Canadian regulation overhaul

© iStock.com/Thisisdavid88

Feed groups ask US regulators to go slow with biotech review

Regulator launches search for meat products sourced from Euro Freeze

© istock

Call to regulators to allow prophylactic claims for feed additives

Regulation, disease management mark areas for aquaculture improvement

Regulation, disease management mark areas for aquaculture improvement

© istock.com/Vladimir Cetinski

How should the new EU feed additives regulation pan out?

© iStock

FAO: More research, regulation needed for probiotics in feed

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.