Call to regulators to allow prophylactic claims for feed additives

© istock

The effect of nutrition on animal health is scientifically evident and communication and progress should not be blocked by regulations, argues a leading light of the feed industry. 

Regulatory recognition of the prophylactic effects of feed additives including organic acids, butyrates, botanicals, yeasts, or pro and prebiotics on animal health should further facilitate progress in the reduction of global antimicrobial resistance (AMR), noted Leo den Hartog, director of R&D at Trouw Nutrition.

He drew such a conclusion in a recently published Feedipedia paper outlining effective nutritional strategies to reduce antibiotic use in livestock production, co-authored by his Nutreco colleague, Coen Smits, and Wouter Hendriks of Wagenignen University.

Also part-time professor in sustainable animal nutrition in production chains at Wageningen University, den Hartog told FeedNavigator this week:

“The feed additives and dietary measures described in the paper contribute in general to mitigation of health risks of animals.

“We [wrote] about the functional effects of already approved ingredients. Many of these measures do not consistently improve productivity in non-challenged conditions and, therefore, cannot be treated as ‘zootechnical’ or performance enhancing additives. 

“There is no regulatory space at this moment to claim mitigation of health risks, in general, and we would like to invite regulatory bodies to think and create proactively a regulatory space where it will be possible to claim such risk mitigating effects.”

Experiments

In a series of studies, den Hartog et al said they tested a specific combination of organic acids, with butyrate, medium chain fatty acids (MCFA) and a selected phenolic compound in both broiler chickens and piglets.

The butyrate and MCFA component had controlled-release properties to deliver the bioactive in more distal sections of the gastrointestinal tract, they reported.

On average, the team said they saw a significant improvement in average daily gain and feed efficiency of respectively 3 and 1%.

The diarrhea incidence tended to be lower in piglets fed the additive blend, added the Dutch team.

Those effects were in line with the magnitude of the responses described by Laxminarayan et al. (2015) for antibiotic growth promoters (AGP), noted the authors.

“In challenge conditions, the effect of the feed additive blend on average daily gain and feed efficiency was more pronounced, demonstrating indirectly that this intervention strategy may, at least partially, prevent or ameliorate the possible effect of infectious challenges.

“Such combination concepts should not be seen as ‘curative’ but may contribute to the prophylaxis of specific enteric diseases and disorders. In the above mentioned blend, probiotics or prebiotics were not applied, but, also, these additives may be used as effective tools for creating synergistic blends to support gastrointestinal health.

“However, we observed less consistent results in experiments with specific added probiotics and prebiotics in earlier research (unpublished data),” wrote den Hartog et al.

They argued that feed additives can create a strong mucosal barrier in pigs and poultry by enforcing gut integrity and modulating the immune system in such a way that the response is adequate but not excessive so as to avoid inflammation.

The researchers said the global feed industry can play a major role in lowering AMR by adopting new insights and novel technologies in feed formulations and feed additives. The speed at which this adoption can be implemented will be critical though, stressed den Hartog et al.

Source: Feedipedia, Broadening Horizons N°34, October 2016

Title: Feed additive strategies for replacement of antimicrobial growth promoters and a responsible use of antibiotics

Authors: LA den Hartog, CHM Smits, WH Hendriks

Related News

© istock

‘Phytogenics are moving from niche to mainstream’

© istock

Nor Feed gets EU thumbs-up for its dry grape extract

© istock

Feeding cows milk that may contain antibiotic residues - what's the risk?

Can preventative health stop AMR in its tracks?

Can preventative health stop AMR in its tracks?

© istock.com/NiroDesign

Feed additives market set to see hike in value of over $7bn by 2021: AMR

© istock.com/Shef-time

BfR antimicrobial resistance poultry project to weigh up botanicals, probiotics

© Alex Raths

FSA weighs in on antimicrobial resistance debate

Researchers look to genetic sequencing for answers on AMR causes

Researchers look to genetic sequencing to see if feed antibiotics contribute to resistance

© istock.com/AlexRaths

Bacteria in humans, food and animals continues to show resistance to antimicrobials, finds EU report

FEFAC and FEFANA call for more EU level funding for pre-competitive research to close the knowledge gaps on animal nutrition and AMR control

From the defensive to the offensive – EU feed sector is retelling its story

© iStock/PeterHeermesFurian

Canada aims to enhance regulatory oversight of antimicrobials used in livestock production

© istock.com

UK poultry antibiotic data disclosure puts the squeeze on wider industry: Alltech

EW Nutrition's Klausing: 'What we determined was that the sows were lying on their belly to protect their udder from the cold as the flow rate of the air in the barn was much too high. The piglets were not receiving colostrum quickly enough as a result.' Image: © istock.com/Aumsama

EW Nutrition links formulation and on farm insights to tackle dysbiosis challenges

EU manufacturers welcome legal certainty medicated feed rules offer

EU manufacturers welcome legal certainty medicated feed rules offer

Related Products

See more related products

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.