Concerns over EFSA recommendation on copper levels in feed

© istock/Antoine2K

The European Commission has told an EU committee that EFSA’s opinion recommending a reduction in the currently authorized maximum copper content levels in complete feed has generated a lot of reaction within industry and trade associations.

The Authority’s Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) adopted a scientific opinion revising maximum levels of copper (Cu) in feed at its plenary in Brussels in July this year.

The FEEDAP panel said the reduction of Cu in feed for piglets from 170 mg/kg to 25 mg/kg would see a reduction in total Cu emissions from farm animal production by about 20%.   

But the Commission told a meeting of the animal nutrition and veterinary medicines (ANVM) section of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed (SCoPAFF) earlier this month that stakeholders have significant concerns about the EFSA opinion, particularly the recommended reductions in Cu for piglets - from 170 to 25mg/kg feed – and, to a lesser extent, for bovines - from 35 to 30mg/kg feed.

The topic will be discussed again at the October meeting of the SCoPAFF group.

“I am very surprised that this reduction in copper content is proposed,” Jan Fledderus, innovation manager piglets, Nutrition Innovation Center, ForFarmers Group, told this publication last month.

He said the conclusion of a 2015 study at Wageningen University by Bikker et al, partly financed by the feed industry and the Dutch government, was that the addition of 25 mg Cu/kg is sufficient to avoid Cu related deficiency problems in piglets, but that there is a very strong positive linear response on growth and feed efficiency when Cu contents are increased up to 170 mg/kg.

“Any reduction of the copper content will increase the environmental pollution, since more feed will be needed to realize the same piglet performance. In addition, it is also likely [that there would be] an increase in mortality when the Cu content will be reduced to maximum of 25 mg/kg.

And the positive effect of Cu on growth performance and feed efficiency are not restricted to the weaner phase,” argued Fledderus.

Click on Yes or No to participate in survey:


Background to EFSA opinion

The Commission had asked EFSA to issue an opinion on the maximum content of compounds of Cu in feed that would fully meet the animals’ nutritional needs for Cu as a trace element and would also be safe for the animals, the consumer and the environment.

The working group (WG) of the FEEDAP tasked with the mandate had to evaluate the relationship between levels of dietary Cu in animals and differences in their gastrointestinal microbiota to see if there was a need to amend the levels of Cu for use in feed.

In July Jürgen Gropp, chair of that WG, said extensive data collection, acquired through procurement, helped the experts in their assessment and allowed them to identify Cu levels that it believes are “necessary from a nutritional point of view”.

The group, he said, had to take into account the environmental impact of Cu residues in soil, particularly from piglet husbandry, while also ensuring there would no negative impact on animal welfare, safety and productivity from a reduction in Cu levels allowed in feed.

report, commissioned as part of the EFSA procurement exercise and published in May, found that Cu, even at low concentrations in feed, can affect the gut microbiota profile of pigs and broilers.

"It may be concluded from the experiments that supplementing piglet (and growing pigs) diet with low additional copper amounts, below 50 mg/kg Cu, seems to inhibit the population of coliform bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT)," noted the report.

When supplemented to the feed in amounts above 100 mg/kg feed, Cu does not seem to have any effect on the population of coliform bacteria in pigs. The report also found feeding the mineral to piglets and growing pigs at concentrations of 170mg/kg of feed reduces the population of lactobacilli in their gastrointestinal tract.  

Related News

© istock/Rawpixel Ltd

Inconclusive EFSA findings on safety of talc derived feed additive

© istock/aga7ta

Conflict of interest questions: EFSA wants feedback on policy

© istock

Feed additives risk: EFSA asks industry to review draft guidance

© istock/Jevtic

Bacillus subtilis derived additive in sow diets can support piglet growth: EFSA

© istock.com/NiroDesign

Low copper quantities inhibit coliform bacteria in pigs: review

© istock.com/Antoine2K

Dicopper oxide is a safe source of copper for broilers, finds EFSA

© istock/3dalia

EU risk assessor urges big reduction in copper use in piglet feed

© iStock/paulrdunn

What does heat stress mean for tilapia’s copper needs?

© istock.com/tonefotografia

Is there a link between copper additives and antibiotic resistance in pigs?

© iStock/3dalia

EFSA opinion on copper usage in piglet feed rankles

© istock.com/Zerbor

'Premature and disproportionate' - FEFANA dismisses advice to EFSA on copper and antibiotic resistance

© iStock.com

Novus research explores the benefits of the interplay between zinc and copper

Zinc and copper MPLs on EU agenda this week: FEFAC urges caution on dosage reduction

Zinc and copper MPLs on EU agenda this week: FEFAC urges caution on dosage reduction

© iStock.com

Mineral absorption may predict feed efficiency in heifers

© istock.com/Antoine2K

Huvepharma looks to cultivate ZnO usage in French and Dutch pig sectors

Trace minerals may play a role in chick quality: Zinpro focuses on broiler embryo nutrition

Trace minerals may play a role in chick quality: Zinpro focuses on broiler embryo nutrition

Iowa State exploring trace mineral absorption challenges

Iowa State exploring trace mineral absorption challenges

Related Products

See more related products

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.